Moving the HME Industry Forward

General Healthcare

Buying and Selling a DME Supplier

October 19, 2015

AMARILLO, TX – From a purchaser’s standpoint, acquiring a DME supplier has challenges that are not normally associated with non-health care industries.

For example:
• Being dependent on Medicare for revenue can be a mixed blessing. Although Medicare may pay well, it can, pursuant to a post-payment audit, recover revenue it has previously paid. Further, if a large portion of the supplier’s gross revenue is dependent on a competitive bidding contract, then there is a risk that the competitive bidding income will disappear if the supplier’s re-bid for the contract is not accepted. As a result, from a purchaser’s standpoint, financial statements (balance sheet and profit/loss statement) that initially look attractive might end up becoming less attractive.

• From the government’s standpoint, the ability of a supplier to successfully collect revenue is dependent on the supplier’s documentation. If the documentation is sloppy or non-compliant with reimbursement rules, then even though services or products may have been provided, the supplier will not be able to collect its revenue. Likewise, non-compliant documentation can lead to an unfavorable post-payment audit.

• If a supplier has engaged in past fraudulent practices (e.g., payment of kickbacks or billing fraud), then it can be liable to the government for a great deal of money.

When acquiring a supplier through a stock purchase, the acquired company carries with it the liabilities that arose prior to the purchase. When acquiring a supplier through an asset purchase, the purchasing entity is usually not liable for prior acts of the selling entity. However, in an asset acquisition if the government concludes that the asset sale is, in reality, a “de facto merger,”1 then the government might attempt to impose liability on the purchasing entity for the past activity of the selling entity. Although defenses can be raised to counter such an aggressive action by the government, the time and expense in defending the government’s claim can be great.

What a Purchaser Looks for in Acquiring a Supplier
To determine the potential risks involved in an acquisition, the purchaser needs to conduct a thorough due diligence review that incorporates the following:

• Product Mix: How much of the business is related to (i) Medicare-covered products that fall under competitive bidding, (ii) Medicare-covered products that do not fall under competitive bidding, (iii) Medicaid-covered products, (iv) products covered by commercial insurance, (v) products that are cash only, (vi) products that require a physician’s order, and/or (vii) products that do not require a physician’s order?

• Provider and Supplier Number Issues: How many physical locations does the supplier have? Does the supplier have a DMEPOS supplier number and-or a Medicare provider number for each location? What are the supplier’s provider and supplier numbers? Has the supplier closed any locations in the past five years?

• Payer Mix: The attractiveness of the payer mix is generally purchaser specific.

• Competitive Bidding Contract: Is the supplier a party to a competitive bidding contract? If so, what product categories and what CBAs? Does the purchaser want to “take over” the competitive bidding contract?

• Medicaid Issues: Is the supplier a qualified provider to one or more state Medicaid programs? What are the Medicaid provider numbers?

• Employment and Independent Contractor Issues: Does the supplier utilize independent contractors, part-time employees, marketing representatives and/or medical directors? Does the supplier have any employment or personal services contracts with any other health care providers? Do these arrangements comply with applicable safe harbors and Stark?

• Referral Source Issues: Does the supplier have any written or verbal relationship with health care referral sources such as physicians, hospitals, home health agencies or respiratory therapists? Do these arrangements comply with applicable safe harbors and Stark? Do the referral sources also refer to the purchaser? If so, their value to the purchaser will be diminished. Is the seller dependent on one referral source? If so, then the value of the seller will be diminished because of the impact on the seller if the referral source ceases to support the seller. As a general rule of thumb, a single referral source should not be responsible for more than ten percent (10%) of the supplier’s business.

• Documentation Issues: Does the supplier have appropriate documentation in the patients’ files? Does the supplier have properly signed Assignments of Benefits in the patients’ files? Does the supplier have evidence that Medicare beneficiaries receive a copy of the Medicare supplier standards? Do the patient files contain evidence of medical necessity? What audit procedures have been performed to verify proper documentation?

• Numbers, Licensure and Sanction Issues: Have any numbers, licenses, permits, registrations or certificates of authority to operate any part of the supplier ever been revoked, suspended, investigated, or voluntarily surrendered after receiving notice of such investigation by any federal, state or local governmental entity or private accrediting agency? Is the supplier operating with all necessary numbers, licenses, permits, registrations and certificates of authority? Have any current numbers, licenses, permits, registrations or certificates of authority been issued on a temporary or less than full status basis? What numbers, licenses, permits, registrations and certificates of authority have been issued and are currently in effect for the supplier?

• Litigation, Audits and Reviews: Is the supplier aware of potential or ongoing litigation, audit, review or dispute with any payor, health care provider, governmental agency or private accrediting agency, which if successful, would have an adverse effect on the supplier?

• Legal: Has any shareholder, owner, officer, director, manager or employee of the supplier ever been (i) convicted of a health care related felony or been excluded from the Medicare or Medicaid program, or (ii) a party to a lawsuit involving the provision of health care services or payment for these services?

• Financial: A purchaser will carefully examine a seller’s financial statements (preferably audited financial statements) and related documents, including a sample of expense reports and canceled checks. In an asset acquisition, the assets sold to the purchaser should be free and clear of encumbrances, and seller liabilities (e.g. accounts payable and employment liabilities) should remain with the seller. If a seller has substantial liabilities, it is difficult to establish a purchaser price because there may not be much of the purchase price to distribute once the liabilities are paid. How is the supplier performing once all expenses are taken into account? Are the earnings margins in line with industry norms? Are they lower than industry norms and, if so, why? Does the seller have too many locations with too few patients? Does the seller have too many employees for the size of the company? A purchaser expects the business to be profitable from the date of the acquisition. If the supplier’s bottom line is low and this is due to factors and expenses the purchaser can immediately eliminate, then the current earnings margins should not necessarily impact the sale. However, if earnings are low due to factors outside of the purchaser’s control, such as too many locations with too few patients, there is little a purchaser can do to remedy the situation. In that situation, the seller’s options are either to grow the business in the low producing locations or to downsize and concentrate on the strong locations. Is the business generating enough cash flow after all expenses are paid? Does the supplier have sufficient cash to purchase new capital equipment as necessary?

• Understanding Day-to-Day Operations: If the purchaser is expending the resources to conduct due diligence, then it is a safe assumption the purchaser finds the seller attractive and desires to incorporate it into its own operation.

Therefore, the purchaser’s due diligence team must learn how the business is run, and specifically, the steps the seller has taken to make the business a success. The purchaser will study the entire process from intake to billing to customer service.  The purchaser will meet with employees; they are the best people to answer questions regarding the day-to-day operations of the business. The seller will normally not be a part of the interview process. The purchaser may request to participate on a few delivery or service calls.

How a Supplier Can Make Itself Attractive to a Purchaser
Millions of homes are sold every year. Before the realtor brings the first prospective purchaser to look at the home, and before the first open house is held, the homeowner normally expends money and effort to make the home as attractive as possible.

This same concept holds true when the owner of a supplier wishes to sell it. The owner desires to obtain the optimal price for the supplier. Just like a homeowner needs to prepare his home for sale, the supplier needs to take several preparatory steps before seeking purchasers.  These steps can be summarized as follows:

• Financial Statements: The supplier should have an outside CPA prepare a current balance sheet (statement of assets and liabilities) and a year-to-date profit and loss statement (statement of income and expenses). Normally, unless the supplier is large, the financial statements do not need to be audited.

• Income Tax Returns: The supplier should have copies of federal and state tax returns for the last three calendar or fiscal years.

• Billing Audit: The supplier should contract with an outside billing consultant for an on-site visit to conduct a mock audit of the supplier’s documentation and billing procedures. A valid concern of a purchaser is whether the supplier’s documentation (i.e., patient files) and billing procedures can withstand a third party payor audit and whether they are sufficient to allow the purchaser to safely continue billing after the sale takes place. If the purchaser has concerns about the supplier’s documentation and billing procedures, then the purchaser may reduce its offering price in order to compensate for the concerns, delay the purchase, or refuse to close on the sale altogether. By having a mock audit performed, the supplier can clear up many of the purchaser’s anticipated concerns in advance. If problems are discovered during the mock audit, then the supplier can address and resolve these problems before engaging in negotiations with the purchaser.

• Medicare Supplier Numbers: The supplier needs to verify that it has an active Medicare supplier number for each of its locations.

• Medicaid Provider Numbers: If the supplier is a qualified provider to one or more state Medicaid programs, then it needs to verify that it has the requisite active Medicaid provider numbers.

• Employees and Independent Contractors: The supplier needs to examine its relationship with each individual who is involved in marketing on behalf of the supplier (“marketing rep”). If the supplier designates a marketing rep as an employee, then the supplier must assure itself that the marketing rep will be classified by the IRS as a bona fide employee. This allows the supplier to take advantage of the Employee Safe Harbor under the Medicare anti-kickback statute and to pay the employee on a production basis. The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) are sensitive to sham employment arrangements. A supplier should avoid the use of independent contractor marketing reps, if possible. If the supplier nonetheless chooses to utilize independent contractor marketing reps, the company must comply (or substantially comply) with the Personal Services and Management Contracts Safe Harbor. Among other requirements, the compensation to the marketing rep must be fixed one year in advance and must be the fair market value equivalent of the rep’s services.

• Referral Sources: The supplier needs to verify that it is not paying any remuneration to any referral source in exchange for referrals and/or arranging for referrals. Additionally, the supplier needs to be able to assure the purchaser that the referral sources are loyal to the supplier because of the excellent service the supplier has given over the years to its customers; that the referral sources’ loyalty is not limited to the individual owner of the supplier; and that, in all likelihood, the referral sources will continue to refer to the supplier once it is sold to the purchaser.

• Documentation: The supplier needs to verify that it has the appropriate documentation in the patients’ files. The supplier needs to verify that it has properly executed Assignment of Benefits forms in the patients’ files. The supplier needs to confirm that its patient files contain evidence of medical necessity. These tasks can be accomplished during a mock billing audit.

• Numbers, Licenses and Permits: The supplier needs to verify that it has all requisite numbers, licenses, permits, registrations, and certificates of authority to conduct its business.

• Audits, Reviews and Investigations: Preferably, before negotiating with a purchaser, the supplier needs to resolve any ongoing audit, review or investigation. If such an audit, review or investigation cannot be successfully resolved prior to entering into negotiations with a purchaser, then the supplier needs to fully explain the audit, review or investigation to the purchaser and predict the outcome, including an estimate of the potential overpayment or settlement payment.

• Litigation: Preferably, before negotiating with a purchaser, the supplier needs to make a concerted effort to resolve any ongoing litigation. If the supplier is unable to do so, then it needs to be able to fully explain the details of the litigation to the purchaser.

• Customer Satisfaction: The supplier needs to verify that its customers are satisfied with the services they receive from the supplier. The purchaser will want to avoid the situation where, after closing, it discovers that a number of the supplier’s customers are dissatisfied with the service provided by the supplier. A dissatisfied customer might register a complaint with a governmental agency or with a third party payor, which could trigger a review, audit or investigation. Likewise, if the supplier provides products to members of a managed care organization, a significant piece of business could be lost if the managed care organization cancels its contract.

Often, the purchaser will attempt to reduce the purchase price if the purchaser concludes there are uncertainties that might affect the value of the acquired supplier subsequent to closing.  By addressing these issues prior to entering into negotiations with the purchaser, the supplier will be in the position to insist on the best purchase price possible.

Stock Versus Asset Acquisition
When acquiring a supplier, the purchaser can either purchase the assets of the DME operation or the stock of the owner of the supplier. Each type of purchase results its own unique set of benefits and drawbacks.

In an asset acquisition, as a general rule, the purchaser does not assume any liabilities of the seller except for the liabilities that the purchaser expressly agrees to assume. Most importantly, if the seller has engaged in prior fraudulent activities, then generally speaking, the government will not attempt to impose successor liability on the purchaser.

As a caveat, if the government concludes that the asset sale is, in reality, a “de facto merger,” then it might attempt to impose successor liability on the purchaser.

Medicare supplier numbers are tied to tax identification numbers. In an asset acquisition of a supplier, the acquired DME operation will be continued under a new tax ID number (the purchaser’s tax ID number). If the purchaser moves the acquired DME operation to an existing DME location owned by the purchaser (for which the purchaser already has a supplier number), then there will be no requirement for the purchaser to apply for a new supplier number. However, as is often the case, if the acquired DME operation will be continued at the seller’s old location, or at a different location, then the purchaser will need to apply for a new supplier number for that location. Before submitting an application for a new supplier number, the purchaser must be accredited for the new location.

In addition, the purchaser must have a surety bond for each location that has a supplier number issued to it. It normally takes two to three months to obtain a new supplier number from the National Supplier Clearinghouse (“NSC”). Normally, during the interim period, the purchaser can sell products and services out of the new location, can accrue the claims to be submitted at a later date, but cannot actually bill for the claims until the new supplier number is received.  In short, the purchaser will experience a cash flow crunch. Unfortunately, the purchaser cannot bill for the products and services under the seller’s old supplier number (because the seller is no longer conducting the DME operation) and the purchaser cannot bill under one of the purchaser’s supplier numbers attached to a different location.

On the other hand, in a stock acquisition, the DME operation remains with the same corporation (the entity whose stock is sold) and the supplier number remains attached to the same tax ID number (the corporation whose stock is sold to the purchaser). Therefore, there is no break in billing and the purchaser does not experience a cash flow interruption. The downside is that if the selling corporation engaged in prior activities that result in an overpayment or a recoupment demand or in an allegation of fraud, then the selling corporation remains liable for the prior activities.

Steps to Bring an Acquisition to Fruition
The purchaser and seller should take the following steps that will increase the chances that the acquisition will be consummated:

• The purchaser and seller should each employ an experienced transactional attorney and an experienced health care regulatory attorney.

• The purchaser and seller will initially execute a confidentiality/non-disclosure agreement. This will allow the seller to forward financial and other confidential data to the purchaser so that the purchaser can make a preliminary determination as to whether it wishes to follow through with the acquisition. Once the purchaser decides that it wishes to follow through with the acquisition, then the parties will sign a non-binding letter of intent. The letter of intent needs to be as detailed as possible and contain as many of the actual terms as possible that the parties believe will be included in the definitive agreement (either a Stock Purchase Agreement or Asset Purchase Agreement). The letter of intent may set out the date the definitive agreement will be executed and the date that closing will occur.  When executing the letter of intent, the purchaser and the seller will have decided whether the acquisition is an asset acquisition or a stock acquisition.

• Between the time of execution of the letter of intent and the time of execution of the definitive agreement, the purchaser will conduct due diligence. There are three types of “due diligence:” Financial Due Diligence, Corporate Due Diligence, and Regulatory Due Diligence.  With a stock acquisition, due diligence is particularly important. This is because all of the “skeletons in the closet” remain with the entity being purchased. With an asset acquisition, due diligence is also important but it does not have to be as thorough as due diligence pertaining to a stock acquisition. This is because the purchaser of assets will only assume the liabilities that the purchaser chooses to assume.

•• Financial Due Diligence entails the review of bank statements, cash flow statements, tax returns, and financial statements. The goal of this due diligence is to determine the financial condition of the seller. This type of due diligence is handled by the purchaser’s accountants.

•• Corporate Due Diligence entails reviewing documents to confirm that the seller is a legal entity in good standing. Steps include (i) obtaining a Certificate of Good Standing from the state of incorporation of the seller; (ii) obtaining a UCC Lien Search Report which shows that the seller’s assets are not subject to a perfected security interest; (iii) obtaining confirmation that the seller does not owe corporate franchise taxes, use/sales/excise taxes, personal property taxes, past due payroll taxes, etc.; and (iv) review of the seller’s corporate minute book to determine if the seller has the appropriate organizational agreements in place and has up-to-date minutes.  Normally, this type of due diligence is handled by the purchaser’s attorney.

• Regulatory Due Diligence entails reviewing documents to confirm that the seller is compliant with health care statutes and regulations. Steps include (i) reviewing patient files to confirm that they contain the requisite documentation; (ii) reviewing results of current and ongoing post payment audits and prepayment reviews; (iii) reviewing communications with governmental agencies; (iv) reviewing the patient complaint log; (v) reviewing the seller’s marketing practices and the seller’s arrangements with referral sources; and (vi) interviewing employees.  Normally, the purchaser’s employees and the purchaser’s attorney work together to handle this type of due diligence.

• The seller and purchaser will then execute the definitive agreement. In so doing, the purchaser will desire to pay as little cash up front as possible and to pay as much of the purchase price on the back end as possible. Payment of the balance of the purchase price will be conditioned on the veracity of the seller’s representations, and that no third party audits and/or government inquiries or investigations arise that will jeopardize the value of the acquired business. If problems do arise following closing, then the definitive agreement will give the purchaser the right to offset a portion of the purchase price (to be paid on the back end) against the damages to be sustained by the purchaser as a result of the unanticipated problems following closing. In short, the purchaser will retain as much of the purchase price as possible to pay for unanticipated problems that arise following closing. To use the time-honored phrase: “Possession is 9/10ths of everything.” On the other hand, the seller will desire to be paid as much cash up front as possible and to receive as little of the purchase price on the back end as possible.

• At closing, the parties will execute the appropriate instruments necessary to transfer assets or assign stock, assign leases or sublet premises, assign contracts and other documents necessary to transfer the business. Also, prior to closing, the purchaser will ascertain which employees of the seller that the purchaser wishes to retain. A condition of closing should be that the designated employees sign employment agreements with the purchaser that include reasonable non-compete and non-disclosure provisions.

• In a stock acquisition, the purchaser will wait as long as possible before the acquired corporation is collapsed or merged into the purchaser’s corporation.  Likewise, as much time as possible may lapse before the operations of the acquired corporation are merged or collapsed into the purchaser’s operations. In this way, if unanticipated problems arise with reference to the acquired corporation’s past actions, then the purchaser can assert the argument that any type of successor liability should remain with the acquired corporation and should not be imposed on the purchaser.

• As a condition of closing, the purchaser may require that the principals of the seller remain as employees of the purchaser for a period of time (e.g., six to twelve months). As a condition of their employment, the principals of the seller will introduce the purchaser and the purchaser’s management and employees to key referral sources. Of course, principals of the seller will have to execute reasonable non-compete/non-disclosure agreements.

Jeffrey S. Baird, JD, is chairman of the Health Care Group at Brown & Fortunato PC, a law firm based in Amarillo, Tex. He represents pharmacies, infusion companies, HME companies and other health care providers throughout the United States. Baird is Board Certified in Health Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, and can be reached at (806) 345-6320 or